Doctor Who 1.5: Flesh and Stone review

Review

Flesh and StoneThe Beast Below review

The Doctor: Yeah, but we have comfy chairs. Did I mention?

Production Code: 1.5.
Story Number: 206b.

The utterly brilliant story continues…

Flesh and Stone reviewAnd what a story it is. The sudden inversion of the whole cast at the start of the episode is an ingenious resolution to the cliffhanger, and as the camera moves back, surely this is one of the most spectacular Doctor Who scenes ever onscreen, the cast upside down on a “spaceship, in a maze”? There is more to come though.

picAll the way through, the story breaks down the classic elements of the Doctor Who story only to build them up again into something new – a simple Doctor Who corridor becomes a thing of wonder, when viewed from a slight angle. So, yes, the base is sieged like many a classic (and “Classic”) story but things don’t quite go as expected, in this “forest in a bottle on a spaceship in a maze”. This time “everybody dies” (except the regulars), which isn’t the usual Moffat thing to do with a story. There is a lyrical scene where Octavian (played by Iain Glen) says goodbye to the Doctor, and this tone of doom is expanded upon by the second-from-last scene.

pic This particular scene, the twist of River Song being not quite what she seems is elaborated upon (another inversion, is she the Doctor’s doom rather than his romantic interest – or is she both?) An excellent Doctor Who “base under siege” tale then, with little extra surprises like this added in throughout the story, scenes constantly confounding expectations. Such as the last scene.

pic It’s been foreshadowed though – the Doctor has always been “the other man” as far as Amy’s and Rory’s relationship is concerned

Rating: 5/5 (for this part of the story)
and for the whole story, 5/5.

Advertisements

2 Responses to “Doctor Who 1.5: Flesh and Stone review”

  1. David H Says:

    Sacred Bob’s almost affect-less voice was chilling, and Octavian’s death scene very touching. And was that the Doctor crossing his own timeline?

    “But you don’t always tell me the truth.”

  2. Gillian Philip Says:

    But I can’t have been the only one who was disappointed to see the Angels move? So much more sinister when they didn’t. And Amy convincing the Angels she could see them was not consistent with their nature. The Angels are frozen as statues *when they are observed*, not when they *think* they are.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: